•  
  •  
 

Abstract

A prosthetic socket is essential for achieving comfort, gait symmetry, and overall satisfaction for amputees. Effective suspension systems are crucial for securely attaching prostheses, thereby optimizing comfort, functional performance, and long-term limb health. This study aimed to develop and evaluate an intelligent vacuum-assisted suspension system for transtibial prostheses to improve socket fit, gait stability, and reduce residual limb movement. The system integrates force-sensitive resistors (FSRs) and an inertial measurement unit (MPU6050) with accelerometer and gyroscope sensors, continuously monitoring interface pressure and limb motion. Real-time data from these sensors dynamically adjusts vacuum pressure based on the user's gait pattern .Quantitative gait analysis conducted with the G-Walk system under non-vacuum and vacuum conditions identified biomechanical deficiencies without vacuum, including reduced gait quality, decreased stride length, and asymmetrical pelvic motion. When the vacuum system was activated, walking speed increased from 0.88 m/s to 1.04 m/s (~18%), propulsion force improved from 5.5 N to 8.0 N, and the symmetry index rose from 74.7% to 83.3%, reflecting more efficient push-off, enhanced bilateral balance, and improved dynamic stability. These findings extend previous work, such as Gholizadeh et al. (2020) and Coburn et al. (2022), by not only confirming improvements in socket stability but also providing clear quantitative evidence of enhanced gait mechanics. Compared to Kent et al. (2024), who emphasized functional benefits of vacuum-assisted suspension, the present system demonstrates measurable biomechanical gains through dynamic, real-time vacuum regulation. Long-term functional measurements showed consistent improvements in stride uniformity and cadence, demonstrating the system’s efficacy in enhancing limb-socket interaction, dynamic alignment, and overall gait efficiency. Because this study is based on a single case, the results are still preliminary and require confirmation through studies involving multiple participants.

References

[1] Thibault G, Gholizadeh H, Sinitski E, Baddour N, Lemaire ED. Effects of the Unity vacuum suspension system on transtibial gait for simulated non-level surfaces. PLoS One 2018;13(6):e0199181. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0199181.

[2] Klute GK, Berge JS, Biggs W, Pongnumkul S, Popovic Z, Curless B. Vacuum-assisted socket suspension compared with pin suspension for lower extremity amputees: effect on f it, activity, and limb volume. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92(10):1570—5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.05.019.

[3] Youngblood RT, Hafner BJ, Czerniecki JM, Brzostowski JT, Allyn KJ, Sanders JE. Modeling the mechanics of elevated vacuum systems in prosthetic sockets. Med Eng Phys 2020; 84:75—83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2020.07.019.

[4] Gholizadeh H, Lemaire ED, Salekrostam R. Mechanical evaluation of the Unity elevated vacuum suspension sys tem. Can Prosthet Orthot J 2020;2(2):32941. https://doi.org/ 10.33137/cpoj.v2i2.32941.

[5] Youngblood RT. Physiological and mechanical effects of prosthetic elevated vacuum systems in people with trans tibial amputation (Doctoral dissertation). 2019.

[6] Le H, Guerra G, Sasaki K, Phongphibool S, Smith JD, Wongpanya J, et al. Oxygen consumption and speed per formance of a runner with amputation wearing an elevated vacuum running prosthesis. JPO J Prosthetics Orthot 2021; 33(1):73—9. https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.000000000000031. .

[7] Major MJ, Caldwell R, Fatone S. Comparative effectiveness of electric vacuum pumps for creating suspension in transfemoral sockets. JPO J Prosthetics Orthot 2015;27(4): 149—53.

[8] Komolafe O, Wood S, Caldwell R, Hansen A, Fatone S. Methods for characterization of mechanical and electrical prosthetic vacuum pumps. J Rehabil Res Dev 2013;50(8). https://doi.org/10.1097/JPO.0000000000000073. .

[9] Coburn KA, DeGrasse NS, Mertens JC, Allyn KJ, McCarthy NK, Ballesteros D, et al. An instrumented printed insert for continuous monitoring of distal limb motion in suction and elevated vacuum sockets. Prosthesis 2022;4(4): 710—29. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis4040056.

[10] Klotz R, Emile G, Daviet JC, De Seze M, Godet J, Urbinelli R, et al. Daily socket comfort in transtibial amputee with a vacuum-assisted suspension system: study protocol of a randomized, multicenter, double-blind multiple N-of-1 trial. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 2023;15(1):85.

[11] Kent JA, Carnahan KJ, Major MJ. Exploring the effects of increased socket-residual limb coupling integrity via vac uum-assisted suspension on prosthetic control: a pre liminary study in transtibial prosthesis users. Disabil Rehabil 2025;47(9):2450—8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288. 2024.2395454.

Download

Share

COinS