APPLICATIONS OF CLUSTERED REGULARLY INTERSPACED SHORT PALINDROMIC REPEATS IN FOOD SECURITY AND NUTRACEUTICALS

Authors

Rukayat Abiodun Oyegoke, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, NigeriaFollow
Jahswill Toluwanimi Osifade, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria
Adenike Temidayo Oladiji, Federal University of Technology, Akure (FUTA)

Abstract

The CRISPR/Cas9 system is a revolutionary genome-editing tool that enables precise and inheritable modifications, transforming plant genetic engineering. Previous literature has indicated that, in agriculture, CRISPR has improved crop yield, biofortification, and resistance to environmental stressors, fostering resilient and high-yielding crops essential for sustaining a growing global population. In nutraceuticals, CRISPR has enhanced the biosynthesis of bioactive compounds such as anthocyanins, flavonoids, and omega-3 fatty acids, improving the nutritional and therapeutic value of crops.

Despite its immense potential, CRISPR technology faces technical, ethical, and regulatory challenges, including off-target effects, accessibility concerns, and public acceptance. Addressing these issues is crucial for its sustainable adoption. Future innovations, including the integration of CRISPR with complementary technologies, will further improve its precision and accessibility, which will facilitate advancements in food security and in the nutraceutical industry. This review aims to explore the applications of CRISPR in enhancing food security and nutraceutical development, assess its impact on crop improvement, and discuss the challenges associated with its adoption.

Recommended Citation

Oyegoke, Rukayat Abiodun; Osifade, Jahswill Toluwanimi; and Oladiji, Adenike Temidayo (2025) "APPLICATIONS OF CLUSTERED REGULARLY INTERSPACED SHORT PALINDROMIC REPEATS IN FOOD SECURITY AND NUTRACEUTICALS," Al-Bahir Journal for Engineering and Pure Sciences: Vol. 6: Iss. 2, Article 8.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.55810/2313-0083.1096

References

[1] The World Bank. Population growth (annual%) [Internet] 2019. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ SP.POP.GROW.

[2] FAO. The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2022. Rome: FAO; 2022.

[3] Gu D, Andreev K, Dupre ME. Major trends in population growth around the world. China CDC Wkly 2021;3(28): 604e13. https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2021.160.

[4] McKenzie FC, Williams J. Sustainable food production: constraints, challenges, and choices by 2050. Food Sec 2015;7: 221e33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0441-1.

[5] Zhao C, Liu B, Piao S, Wang X, Lobell DB, Huang Y, et al. Temperature increase reduces global yields of major crops in four independent estimates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2017; 114:9326e31. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1701762114.

[6] Mondal S, Singh RP, Crossa J, Huerta-Espino J, Sharma I, Chatrath R, et al. Earliness in wheat: a key to adaptation under terminal and continual high-temperature stress in South Asia. Field Crops Res 2013;151:19e26. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.06.015.

[7] Farhad M, Kumar U, Tomar V, Bhati PK, Krishnan JN, Kishowar-E-Mustarin, et al. Heat stress in wheat: a global challenge to feed billions in the current era of the changing climate. Front Sustain Food Syst 2023;7:1203721. https:// doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1203721.

[8] Stewart WM, Roberts TL. Food security and the role of fertilizer in supporting it. Procedia Eng 2012;46:76e82.

[9] Davidson EA. The contribution of manure and fertilizer nitrogen to atmospheric nitrous oxide since 1860. Nat Geosci 2009;2:659e62.

[10] Obersteiner M, Penuelas J, Ciais P, van der Velde M, ~ Janssens IA. The phosphorus trilemma. Nat Geosci 2013;6: 897e8.

[11] MacDonald GK, Bennett EM, Potter PA, Ramankutty N. Agronomic phosphorus imbalances across the world's croplands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:3086e91.

[12] Kumar M, Pandey SS, Kumar P, Yadav VK, Shukla AK. Nutraceuticals manufacturing challenges in fast-growing food segment in India. In: Formulations, regulations, and challenges of nutraceuticals. Apple Academic Press; 2025. p. 255e84.

[13] Chopra AS, Lordan R, Horbanczuk OK, Atanasov AG, Chopra I, Horbanczuk JO, et al. The current use and evolving landscape of nutraceuticals. Pharmacol Res 2021;175:106001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2021.106001.

[14] Santini C, Supino S, Bailetti L. The nutraceutical industry: trends and dynamics. In: Case stud bus nutraceuticals funct super foods; 2022. p. 3e20. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12- 821408-4.00006-7.

[15] Zhang D, Hussain A, Manghwar H, Xie K, Xie S, Zhao S, et al. Genome editing with the CRISPR-Cas system: an art, ethics, and global regulatory perspective. Plant Biotechnol J 2020;18(8):1651e69. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13383.

[16] Asmamaw M, Zawdie B. Mechanism and applications of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing. Biol Targets Ther 2021;15:353e61. https://doi.org/10.2147/BTT.S326422.

[17] Kumar D, Yadav A, Ahmad R, Dwivedi UN, Yadav K. CRISPR-based genome editing for nutrient enrichment in crops: a promising approach toward global food security. Front Genet 2022;13:932859. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene. 2022.932859.

[18] Chakravorty M, Nanda M, Arora N, Singh S, Kumar V, Deshwal S. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome tailoring to improve nutritional quality and shelf life in crops: a review. Plant Gene 2022;31:100369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plgene. 2022.100369. 8 AL-BAHIR JOURNAL FOR ENGINEERING AND PURE SCIENCES 2025;XX:1e10

[19] Marraffini LA, Sontheimer EJ. CRISPR interference: RNAdirected adaptive immunity in bacteria and archaea. Nat Rev Genet 2010;11(3):181e90. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2749.

[20] Jin Z. The molecular mechanism of CRISPR/Cas9 system and its application in gene therapy of human diseases. Microrev Cell Mol Biol 2017;3:1e10.

[21] Jiang H, Tang M, Xu Z, Wang Y, Li M, Zheng S, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 system and its applications in nervous system diseases. Genes Diseases 2024;11(2):675e86. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.gendis.2023.03.017.

[22] Shen L, Wang C, Fu Y, Wang J, Liu Q, Zhang X, et al. QTL editing confers opposing yield performance in different rice varieties. J Integr Plant Biol 2018;60(1):89e93.

[23] Usman B, Nawaz G, Zhao N, Liao S, Qin B, Liu F, et al. Programmed editing of rice (Oryza sativa L.) OsSPL16 gene using CRISPR/Cas9 improves grain yield by modulating the expression of pyruvate enzymes and cell cycle proteins. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22(1):249. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijms22063225.

[24] Li J, Jiao G, Sun Y, Chen J, Zhong Y, Yan L, et al. Modification of starch composition, structure and properties through editing of TaSBEIIa in both winter and spring wheat varieties by CRISPR/Cas9. Plant Biotechnol J 2020;19:937e51.

[25] Ain NU, Haider FU, Fatima M, Habiba H, Zhou Y, Ming R. Genetic determinants of biomass in C4 crops: molecular and agronomic approaches to increase biomass for biofuels. Front Plant Sci 2022;13:839588. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpls.2022.839588.

[26] Wang W, Hu B, Yuan D, Liu Y, Che R, Hu Y, et al. Expression of the nitrate transporter gene OsNRT1.1A/OsNPF6.3 confers high yield and early maturation in rice. Plant Cell 2018; 30(3):638e51. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.17.00809.

[27] Xu J, Soni V, Chopra M, Chan O. Genetic modification of the HSP90 gene using CRISPR-Cas9 to enhance thermotolerance in T. Suecica. Undergrad Res Nat Clin Sci Technol J 2020;4: 1e6. https://doi.org/10.26685/urncst.178.

[28] Usman B, Nawaz G, Zhao N, Liao S, Liu Y, Li R. Precise editing of the OsPYL9 gene by RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease confers enhanced drought tolerance and grain yield in rice (Oryza sativa L.) by regulating circadian rhythm and abiotic stress responsive proteins. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21(21):7854. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21217854.

[29] Zhang Q, He D, Zhang J, He H, Guan G, Xu T, et al. RIP5 interacts with REL1 and negatively regulates drought tolerance in rice. Cells 2024;13(11):887. https://doi.org/10.3390/ cells13110887.

[30] Nekrasov V, Wang C, Win J, Lanz C, Weigel D, Kamoun S. Rapid generation of a transgene-free powdery mildew resistant tomato by genome deletion. Sci Rep 2017;7:482.

[31] Kayastha S, Behera A, Veda DJ, Rayanoothala PS. Precision genome editing for enhanced resistance against bacterial blight in rice: a comprehensive approach. Cereal Res Commun 2024;52(1):1e2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42976-024- 00610-7.

[32] Mehta D, Stürchler A, Anjanappa RB, Zaidi SS, HirschHoffmann M, Gruissem W, et al. Linking CRISPR-Cas9 interference in cassava to the evolution of editing-resistant geminiviruses. Genome Biol 2019;20(1):1e10. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s13059-019-1678-3.

[33] Kim SR, Torollo G, Yoon MR, Kwak J, Lee CK, Prahalada GD, et al. Loss-of-function alleles of Heading date 1 (Hd1) are associated with adaptation of temperate japonica rice plants to the tropical region. Front Plant Sci 2018;9:1827. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01827.

[34] Rasheed A, Gill RA, Hassan MU, Mahmood A, Qari S, Zaman QU, et al. A critical review: recent advancements in the use of CRISPR/Cas9 technology to enhance crops and alleviate global food crises. Curr Issues Mol Biol 2021;43(3): 1950e76. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb43030135.

[35] Pandey S, Singh A, Parida SK, Prasad M. Combining speed breeding with traditional and genomics-assisted breeding for crop improvement. Plant Breed 2022;141(3):301e13. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.13012.

[36] Lebedev VG, Popova AA, Shestibratov KA. Genetic engineering and genome editing for improving nitrogen use efficiency in plants. Cells 2021;10(12):3303. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/cells10123303.

[37] Tiwari JK, Buckseth T, Singh RK, Kumar M, Kant S. Prospects of improving nitrogen use efficiency in potato: lessons from transgenics to genome editing strategies in plants. Front Plant Sci 2020;11:597481. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fpls.2020.597481.

[38] Sathee L, Jagadhesan B, Pandesha PH, Barman D, Adavi BS, Nagar S, et al. Genome editing targets for improving nutrient use efficiency and nutrient stress adaptation. Front Genet 2022;13:900897. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.900897.

[39] Tanaka N, Yoshida S, Islam MS, Yamazaki K, Fujiwara T, Ohmori Y. OsbZIP1 regulates phosphorus uptake and nitrogen utilization, contributing to improved yield. Plant J 2024;118(1):159e70. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.16598.

[40] Gogoi N, Kanwal M, Norman M, Downs J, Ahmad N, Mago R, et al. Wheat pollen uptake of CRISPR/Cas9 RNPPDMAEMA nanoassemblies results in targeted loss of gene function in progeny. bioRxiv 2022;2022e06:494465. https:// doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.02.494465.

[41] Sarker NC, Ray P, Pfau C, Kalavacharla V, Hossain K, Quadir M. Development of functional nanomaterials from wheat bran derived arabinoxylan for nucleic acid delivery. J Agric Food Chem 2020;68(15):4367e73. https://doi.org/ 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c00029.

[42] Ganie SA, Wani SH, Henry R, Hensel G. Improving rice salt tolerance by precision breeding in a new era. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2021;60:101996.

[43] Soyk S, Müller NA, Park SJ, Schmalenbach I, Jiang K, Hayama R, et al. Variation in the flowering gene SELF PRUNING 5G promotes day-neutrality and early yield in tomato. Nat Genet 2017;49:162e8.

[44] Wang H, Wu Y, Zhang Y, Yang J, Fan W, Zhang H, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-based mutagenesis of starch biosynthetic genes in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) for the improvement of starch quality. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20(19):4702.

[45] Morineau C, Bellec Y, Tellier F, Gissot L, Kelemen Z, Nogue F, et al. Selective gene dosage by CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in hexaploid Camelina sativa. Plant Biotechnol J 2017;15:729e39.

[46] Okuzaki A, Ogawa T, Koizuka C, Kaneko K, Inaba M, Imamura J, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing of the fatty acid desaturase 2 gene in Brassica napus. Plant Physiol Biochem 2018;131:63e9.

[47] Lee KR, Jeon I, Yu H, Kim SG, Kim HS, Ahn SJ, et al. Increasing monounsaturated fatty acid contents in hexaploid Camelina sativa seed oil by FAD2 gene knockout using CRISPR-Cas9. Front Plant Sci 2021;12:702930. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fpls.2021.702930.

[48] Majumder S, Datta K, Datta SK. Rice biofortification: high iron, zinc, and vitamin-A to fight against “hidden hunger”. Agronomy 2019;9(12):803. https://doi.org/10.3390/ agronomy9120803.

[49] Liang Z, Zhang K, Chen K, Gao C. Targeted mutagenesis in Zea mays using TALENs and the CRISPR/Cas system. J Genet Genomics 2014;41(2):63e8.

[50] Nissar J, Ahad T, Naik HR, Hussain SZ. Phytic acid: as antinutrient or nutraceutical. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 2017; 6(6):1554e60.

[51] Zhang Y, Butelli E, Alseekh S, Tohge T, Rallapalli G, Luo J, et al. Multi-level engineering facilitates the production of phenylpropanoid compounds in tomato. Nat Commun 2015; 6:8635e45. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9635.

[52] Shepherd LV, Hackett CA, Alexander CJ, McNicol JW, Sungurtas JA, Stewart D, et al. Modifying glycoalkaloid content in transgenic potatodmetabolome impacts. Food Chem 2015;187:437e43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem. 2015.04.111.

[53] Singh S, Yadav S, Singh A. Recent approaches for breeding vegetable crops for quality, rich in nutrients and nutraceuticals. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 2021;10(1):2061e71. AL-BAHIR JOURNAL FOR ENGINEERING AND PURE SCIENCES 2025;XX:1e10 9

[54] Asati V, Srivastava A, Mukherjee S, Sharma PK. Comparative analysis of antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of crude and purified flavonoid-enriched fractions of pods/ seeds of two desert legumes Prosopis cineraria and Cyamopsis tetragonoloba. Heliyon 2021;7:e07304.

[55] Petrie JR, Shrestha P, Belide S, Kennedy Y, Lester G, Liu Q, et al. Metabolic engineering Camelina sativa with fish oillike levels of DHA. PLoS One 2014;9(1):e85061. https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085061.

[56] Mansour MP, Shrestha P, Belide S, Petrie JR, Nichols PD, Singh SP. Characterization of oilseed lipids from DHA-producing Camelina sativa: a new transformed land plant containing long-chain omega-3 oils. Nutrients 2014;6(2):776e89. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu6020776.

[57] Fuentes-Zaragoza E, Sanchez-Zapata E, Sendra E, Sayas E, Navarro C, Fernandez-L opez J, et al. Resistant starch as prebiotic: a review. Starch 2011;63(7):406e15. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/star.201000099.

[58] Zhou XR, Liu Q, Singh S. Engineering nutritionally improved edible plant oils. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 2023; 14:247e69.

[59] Wu J, Du G, Chen J, Zhou J. Enhancing flavonoid production by systematically tuning the central metabolic pathways based on a CRISPR interference system in Escherichia coli. Sci Rep 2015;5:13477. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13477.

[60] Wu J, Zhou P, Zhang X, Dong M. Efficient de novo synthesis of resveratrol by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2017;44:1083e95. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10295-017-1937-9.

[61] Cress BF, Toparlak OD, Guleria S, Lebovich M, Stieglitz JT, € Englaender JA, et al. CRISPathBrick: modular combinatorial assembly of type II-A CRISPR arrays for dCas9-mediated multiplex transcriptional repression in Escherichia coli. ACS Synth Biol 2015;4:987e1000. https://doi.org/10.1021/ acssynbio.5b00012.

[62] Shi S, Qi N, Nielsen J. Microbial production of chemicals driven by CRISPR-Cas systems. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2022; 73:34e42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2021.07.002.

[63] Modrzejewski D, Hartung F, Lehnert H, Sprink T, Kohl C, Keilwagen J, et al. Which factors affect the occurrence of off target effects caused by the use of CRISPR/Cas: a systematic review in plants. Front Plant Sci 2020;11:574959. https:// doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.574959.

[64] Huang X, Yang D, Zhang J, Xu J, Chen YE. Recent advances in improving gene-editing specificity through CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease engineering. Cells 2022;11(14):2186. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/cells11142186.

[65] Levengood H, Zhou Y, Zhang C. Advancements in plant transformation: from traditional methods to cutting-edge techniques and emerging model species. Plant Cell Rep 2024; 43:273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-024-03359-9.

66] Kang X, He W, Huang Y, Yu Q, Chen Y, Gao X, et al. Introducing precise genetic modifications into human 3PN embryos by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing. J Assist Reprod Genet 2016;33:581e8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815- 016-0710-8.

[67] Ahmar S, Mahmood T, Fiaz S, Mora-Poblete F, Shafique MS, Chattha MS, et al. Advantage of nanotechnology-based genome editing system and its application in crop improvement. Front Plant Sci 2021;12:663849. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fpls.2021.663849.

[68] Ahmad A, Ghouri MZ, Munawar N, Ismail M, Ashraf S, Aftab SO. Regulatory, ethical, and social aspects of CRISPR crops. In: Ahmad A, Khan SH, Khan Z, editors. CRISPR crops. Singapore: Springer; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 981-15-7142-8_9.

[69] Cavazza A, Hendel A, Bak RO, Rio P, Gueel M, Lainscek D, et al. Progress and harmonization of gene editing to treat human diseases: proceeding of COST Action CA21113 GenE-HumDi. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 2023;34:102066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2023.102066.

[70] Feeney O, Cockbain J, Sterckx S. Ethics, patents and genome editing: a critical assessment of three options of technology governance. Front Polit Sci 2021;3:731505. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fpos.2021.731505.

[71] Montenegro de Wit M. Democratizing CRISPR? Stories, practices, and politics of science and governance on the agricultural gene editing frontier. Elementa Sci Anthropocene 2020;8(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.405.

[72] Agarwal A, Saxena S, Arora S. CRISPR/Cas technology: a climate savior or a genetic Pandora's box? In: Kumar A, Arora S, Ogita S, et al., editors. Gene editing in plants. Singapore: Springer; 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981- 99-8529-6_26.

[73] Bansal P, Kaur N. Assessing risks associated with large-scale adoption of CRISPR gene-edited crops. J Crop Sci Biotechnol 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-024-00273-0.

[74] Rodriguez E. Ethical issues in genome editing using CRISPR/ Cas9 system. J Clin Res Bioeth 2016;7(2):266.

[75] Yuyu C, Aike Z, Pao X, Xiaoxia W, Yongrun C, Beifang W, et al. Effects of GS3 and GL3.1 for grain size editing by CRISPR/Cas9 in rice. Rice Sci 2020;27(5):405e13.

[76] Ahmad S, Tang L, Shahzad R, Mawia AM, Rao GS, Jamil S, et al. CRISPR-based crop improvements: a way forward to achieve zero hunger. J Agric Food Chem 2021;69:8307e23.

[77] Nuccio ML, Claeys H, Heyndrickx KS. CRISPR-Cas technology in corn: a new key to unlock genetic knowledge and create novel products. Mol Breed 2021;41:11.

[78] Lawrenson T, Shorinola O, Stacey N, Li C, Østergaard L, Patron N, et al. Induction of targeted, heritable mutations in barley and Brassica oleracea using RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease. Genome Biol 2015;16:258.

[79] Jiang WZ, Henry IM, Lynagh PG, Comai L, Cahoon EB, Weeks DP. Significant enhancement of fatty acid composition in seeds of the allohexaploid Camelina sativa using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing. Plant Biotechnol J 2017;15: 648e57.

[80] Cai Y, Chen L, Liu X, Guo C, Sun S, Wu C, et al. CRISPR/ Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of GmFT2a delays flowering time in soybean. Plant Biotechnol J 2018;16: 176e85.

[81] Li X, Wang Y, Chen S, Tian H, Fu D, Zhu B, et al. Lycopene is enriched in tomato fruit by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated multiplex genome editing. Front Plant Sci 2018;9:559.

[82] Wang C, Wang G, Gao Y, Lu G, Habben JE, Mao G, et al. A cytokinin-activation enzyme-like gene improves grain yield under various field conditions in rice. Plant Mol Biol 2020;102:373e88.

[83] Chen F, Yang Y, Li B, Liu Z, Khan F, Zhang T, et al. Functional analysis of M-locus protein kinase revealed a novel regulatory mechanism of self-incompatibility in Brassica napus L. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20(13):3303.

[84] Wang Y, Wang J, Guo S, Tian S, Zhang J, Ren Y, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of ClBG1 decreased seed size and promoted seed germination in watermelon. Hortic Res 2021;8:1e12.